According to ipkitten, the court threw the case out because 1) the words looked different; 2) Star is commonly used in trade marks and so wasn’t distinctive; 3) neither ‘preya’ nor ‘bucks’ had any special meaning, and so consumers would be unlikely to separate the trade marks into their constituent elements, referring to both sometimes as Star; and 4) there was no evidence that Elpreya (the parent company) had plagiarised Starbuck’s logo.
What do you think? Should Starbucks have won the case?
1 comment:
Wow, interesting. Theit logos kinda look the same, but I guess it will be hard to win this case coz you would have to prove that they purposely tried to replicate the starbucks logo and business!
Post a Comment