According to ipkitten, the court threw the case out because 1) the words looked different; 2) Star is commonly used in trade marks and so wasn’t distinctive; 3) neither ‘preya’ nor ‘bucks’ had any special meaning, and so consumers would be unlikely to separate the trade marks into their constituent elements, referring to both sometimes as Star; and 4) there was no evidence that Elpreya (the parent company) had plagiarised Starbuck’s logo.
What do you think? Should Starbucks have won the case?
Wow, interesting. Theit logos kinda look the same, but I guess it will be hard to win this case coz you would have to prove that they purposely tried to replicate the starbucks logo and business!
ReplyDelete